Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Nephrol ; 33(1): 70-74, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37197051

RESUMO

Vascular access in hemodialysis is essential to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients' survival. Unfortunately, even after years of recent advances, a significant number of patients may develop multi-access failure for many reasons. In this situation, arterial-venous fistula (AVF) or catheters placement in traditional vascular sites (jugular, femoral, or subclavian) are not feasible. In this scenario, translumbar tunneled dialysis catheters (TLDCs) may be a salvage option. The use of central venous catheters (CVC) is associated with an increased incidence of venous stenosis that can progressively limit future vascular access routes. The common femoral vein can be used for temporary access in patients in whom traditional approaches for permanent central venous access may not be feasible because of either chronically occluded or not accessible vasculature; however, this location is not preferred for long-term venous access because of the high rate of catheter related blood stream infections (CRBSI). In these patients, a direct translumbar approach to the inferior vena cava is a lifesaving alternative. This approach has been described by several authors as a bail-out option. Fluoroscopy-guided access via a translumbar approach into the inferior vena cava bares the risk of hollow-organ perforation or severe bleeding from the inferior vena cava or even the aorta. To minimize the risk of complications caused by a translumbar central venous access, we hereby present a hybrid approach with CT-guided translumbar access of the inferior vena cava followed by a conventional implantation of the permanent central venous catheter. CT scan-guided access of IVC that further helps in our case as patient has large bulky kidneys secondary to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

2.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab ; 27(1): 80-86, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37215273

RESUMO

Introduction: The protocols and criteria used for adrenal venous sampling (AVS) differ across centres. There are no studies from the Indian subcontinent describing AVS-based outcomes in primary aldosteronism (PA). We aim to describe our experience from a single centre. Methods: Retrospective records from 2018 to 2020 of patients with confirmed PA who underwent AVS were reviewed. Clinical, imaging, AVS data and outcomes (as per PASO criteria) were recorded. AVS was performed by sequential sampling with cosyntropin stimulation with intraprocedural cortisol and cut-off of selectivity >5 and lateralization >4 by a single radiologist. Results: Fifteen patients with median age of 50 years (41-58) and duration of hypertension of 156 (36-204) months were included. Ten had grade 3 hypertension, 13 had hypokalaemia and 3 had hypokalaemic paralysis. On CT scan, eight patients had bilateral adrenal lesions, four had unilateral adenoma and three patients had normal adrenals. AVS was bilaterally successful in all and showed lateralization of disease in 10 patients and was bilateral in the remaining 5 patients. Overall concordance of CT and AVS was 5/15 (33.3%). Among seven patients who underwent surgery, complete clinical success was seen in two and partial clinical success in the remaining five. Complete biochemical success was seen in two and partial in one. There were no major complications. Conclusions: AVS performed by a single radiologist with defined protocols has a good success rate. AVS has additional value over CT scan in lateralization, especially when CT shows bilateral disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...